Renascence Blogs
Experience Journal
Ideas, insights, thoughts and many more in our customer experience blog
Employee Experience (EX) in 2025: Trends Shaping the Modern Workplace
In 2025, the landscape of Employee Experience (EX) has evolved significantly, influenced by shifts in work environments, employee expectations, and organizational priorities.
Inconsistency Bias: Discomfort with Inconsistent Information
Imagine a customer reading two different reviews about a smartphone. One review praises its battery life, while another criticizes it. The conflicting information creates discomfort, leading the customer to distrust both reviews and look for a third opinion. This reaction is due to Inconsistency Bias.
Sample Size Insensitivity: Ignoring Sample Size in Judgments
Think of a customer reading reviews for a new restaurant. They see a few glowing reviews and decide the restaurant must be fantastic, ignoring the fact that only three people have left reviews. This is an example of Sample Size Insensitivity.
Self-Expansion Bias: Preference for Opportunities for Personal Growth
Imagine a customer choosing between two fitness apps. One offers a static set of exercises, while the other constantly updates with new challenges and tracks progress. The customer picks the latter because it promises continuous improvement and growth. This decision is influenced by Self-Expansion Bias.
Temporal Anchoring: Relying on Initial Time Estimates
Imagine a customer planning a renovation project. They receive an initial estimate of two weeks for completion. Even if delays occur, they continue to base their expectations on this initial two-week timeframe. This is an example of Temporal Anchoring.
Defensive Attribution: Blaming Victims to Maintain a Just World
Picture a customer reading a news story about someone losing money to a scam. Instead of recognizing the scammer's wrongdoing, they might think, "The victim should have been more careful." This reaction is an example of Defensive Attribution.
Goal-Gradient Effect: Increased Effort as One Approaches a Goal
Imagine a customer using a loyalty card at their favorite coffee shop. As they get closer to earning a free drink, they start visiting the shop more frequently. This increase in visits is influenced by the Goal-Gradient Effect.
Retrospective Falsification: Rewriting Past Events
Imagine a customer who recalls a past purchase and, over time, starts to remember it more positively than it actually was. They might think the product was much better than it truly was, influenced by their current preference for the brand. This is an example of Retrospective Falsification.
Intergroup Bias: Preferences and Prejudices Towards Different Groups
Think of a customer who only buys products from companies that align with their political beliefs. They might avoid brands that they perceive as supporting opposing views, regardless of the quality or value of those products. This behavior is influenced by Intergroup Bias.
Predecisional Distortion: Twisting Information to Fit Initial Preferences
Imagine a customer reading reviews for a smartphone they already like based on brand loyalty. Even if some reviews are mixed, they might interpret the negative ones as less credible or relevant, twisting the information to fit their initial preference. This phenomenon is known as Predecisional Distortion.
Believability Bias: Accepting Statements as True Because They Are Believable
Picture a customer browsing an online store who sees a review stating, "This product changed my life!" The customer might believe this statement without further verification because it aligns with their expectations or desires. This is an example of the Believability Bias at work.
Affective Slant: Emotions Influencing Interpretation of Information
Imagine a customer reading a product review after a frustrating day. They might interpret a neutral comment as more negative than intended due to their current emotional state. This interpretation is influenced by a bias known as the Affective Slant.
Consensus Effect: Overestimating Agreement Among Others
Imagine a customer who strongly prefers eco-friendly products assuming that most people share the same preference. This customer is more likely to choose and recommend these products, thinking they align with a common value system. This tendency is rooted in the Consensus Effect.
Modality Effect: Influence of Sensory Modality on Perception
Imagine a customer in a perfume shop who not only smells the scents but also watches a visually captivating video about the perfume’s origins. Their decision to purchase might be influenced more by the visual appeal of the video than the scent itself. This phenomenon is known as the Modality Effect.
Field Dependency: How Context Influences Customer Perceptions
Think about a customer choosing a wine at a restaurant. They might be influenced more by the ambiance of the place or the waiter’s recommendation rather than the actual quality or taste of the wine itself. This tendency to rely on the surrounding context for decision-making is known as Field Dependency.
Cognitive Miser: Preference for Simplified Thinking in Customer Choices
Imagine a customer quickly selecting the first smartphone they see on a shelf because it’s the most popular model, without bothering to compare specs or read reviews. This behavior reflects a tendency known as the Cognitive Miser effect.
Positive Reinforcement: Encouraging Repeated Customer Behaviors
Think of a loyalty program that rewards customers with points every time they make a purchase, which can later be redeemed for discounts or exclusive offers. Customers are likely to keep coming back to earn more points and enjoy the rewards. This practice is rooted in the concept of Positive Reinforcement.
Agency Heuristic: Overattributing Actions to Human Agency
Imagine reading a news story about a market crash and immediately assuming it happened due to the decisions of a few powerful individuals. Even though various complex factors may have contributed, you tend to focus on the idea that someone's actions directly caused the outcome. This tendency to overattribute events to human actions is an example of the Agency Heuristic.
Loss Discounting: Underestimating Potential Losses
Picture a customer considering a high-risk investment opportunity. The potential for significant returns seems so appealing that they downplay the chances of losing their entire investment. This tendency to undervalue potential losses while focusing on potential gains is an example of Loss Discounting.
Negativity Heuristic: Overemphasis on Negative Information
Imagine browsing online reviews for a new restaurant. Even though most reviews are positive, you can't help but focus on the few negative ones. Despite the overwhelmingly good feedback, those negative reviews weigh heavily on your decision to dine there. This tendency to prioritize negative information is an example of the Negativity Heuristic.
Feature Integration Theory: Combining Features into Perceptual Objects
Imagine a shopper looking at a high-end smartphone. They notice its sleek design, vibrant display, and advanced camera features. As they evaluate these attributes, they begin to see the phone as a singular, high-quality object rather than just a collection of individual features. This process is explained by Feature Integration Theory.
Law of Small Numbers: Overestimating Accuracy of Small Samples
Imagine a customer visiting a new restaurant and having an amazing meal. Excited by their experience, they quickly write a glowing review online, suggesting it’s the best place in town. This judgment, based on a single experience, is an example of the Law of Small Numbers.
Evolutionary Bias: Decisions Influenced by Evolutionary Factors
Think about a customer walking through a grocery store and instinctively gravitating towards brightly colored fruits and vegetables. This attraction isn’t just a matter of preference; it's rooted in an evolutionary instinct where humans are drawn to foods that appear fresh and ripe. This behavior is an example of Evolutionary Bias.
Field Effect: Influence of Environment on Perception
Imagine walking into a high-end boutique with elegant lighting, soft music, and a luxurious ambiance. Even if the products are similar to those in a regular store, your perception of their quality and value is elevated because of the environment. This shift in perception is due to the Field Effect.
Fixed Action Patterns: Automatic Responses to Specific Stimuli
Imagine a customer who always says "thank you" after receiving a service, even when they are not particularly satisfied with it. This automatic response is not necessarily a conscious choice but rather a habit ingrained in them over time. This behavior exemplifies Fixed Action Patterns.
Reproductive Bias: Preference for Familiar Solutions
Think of a customer who always chooses the same brand of toothpaste they've used for years, even though there are newer brands with better features on the shelf. This decision stems from a comfort with the familiar, a behavior explained by Reproductive Bias.
Expectation Bias: How Expectations Shape Customer Perceptions
Picture a customer planning a vacation to a highly-rated resort. They have read glowing reviews and seen beautiful photos online, which sets high expectations for their stay. However, when they arrive, the experience doesn’t quite match what they had imagined. Even though the resort is objectively good, the customer feels disappointed because it didn’t live up to their high expectations. This scenario demonstrates the power of Expectation Bias.
Evaluative Projection: Projecting Current Evaluations into the Future
Imagine a customer enjoying a meal at a newly opened restaurant. They are impressed with the ambiance, service, and food quality during their first visit. Based on this single experience, they project this positive evaluation into the future, expecting every visit to be equally satisfying. This expectation is a manifestation of Evaluative Projection.
Coherence Effect: Preferring Logical Consistency in Stories and Information
Picture a customer browsing through an online store, looking at product descriptions and reviews. They find a product with mixed reviews; some say it's excellent, while others mention serious flaws. The customer feels uneasy and decides not to buy the product because the conflicting information doesn’t form a coherent story. This hesitation is an example of the Coherence Effect.
Focalism Effect: Overemphasis on One Aspect of an Event
Imagine a customer who is considering purchasing a new car. They focus heavily on the car's fuel efficiency because of rising gas prices, paying less attention to other important factors like safety features, reliability, and overall comfort. This tendency to overemphasize one aspect of a decision, while neglecting other relevant factors, illustrates the Focalism Effect.
Lesser of Two Evils: Choosing the Least Negative Option
Imagine a customer who is choosing between two products that both have some downsides. One product is less expensive but has lower quality, while the other is more durable but costs more. The customer ends up choosing the cheaper, lower-quality option, seeing it as the "lesser of two evils" because they are primarily concerned with saving money. This decision-making process illustrates the Lesser of Two Evils bias.
Confirmation Trap: Seeking Evidence to Support Beliefs
Imagine a customer who strongly believes that a particular brand is the best in the market. When shopping for a new product, they actively look for reviews and information that confirm this belief, ignoring any negative feedback or alternatives. This behavior is an example of the Confirmation Trap.
Diagnostic Overshadowing: Dominant Diagnoses Obscuring Others
Imagine a customer who visits a tech support service with a smartphone that has both a battery issue and a software glitch. The technician focuses only on the battery problem because it’s the most obvious issue, overlooking the software glitch. This scenario illustrates Diagnostic Overshadowing.
Inductive Bias: Generalizing from Specific Instances
Think of a customer who has had a positive experience with a specific product from a brand. Based on this single experience, they decide to purchase other products from the same brand, believing they will be equally satisfying. This inclination is an example of Inductive Bias.
Single-Option Aversion: Discomfort with Having Only One Choice
Imagine a customer who walks into a store looking for a new pair of running shoes and finds that only one style is available in their size. Despite the quality and suitability of the shoe, the customer decides not to purchase it because they feel uncomfortable with only one option. This reaction is driven by Single-Option Aversion.
Discounting Principle: Downplaying the Role of Personal Factors in Favor of Situational Factors
Picture a customer who complains about a delayed flight and blames the airline's poor management rather than considering the severe weather conditions that caused the delay. This reaction is influenced by the Discounting Principle.
Bounded Rationality: Customers’ Simplified Decision-Making Processes
Imagine a customer shopping for a new laptop who, instead of considering every possible specification and option, quickly decides based on a few key features like price and battery life. This decision-making process illustrates Bounded Rationality.
Valence Heuristic: Preference for Positive Over Negative Information
Imagine a customer browsing online reviews for a new smartphone. They come across two reviews: one highlights the excellent camera and battery life, while the other points out a few software bugs. The customer decides to buy the phone, focusing more on the positive review than the negative. This decision is driven by the Valence Heuristic.
Algorithm Aversion: Distrust of Automated Decisions
Imagine a customer deciding to call customer service to speak with a human representative instead of using a well-designed automated chatbot that could resolve their issue faster. This hesitation is an example of Algorithm Aversion.
Liking Bias: Influence of Personal Affection on Decisions
Picture a customer who chooses a local bakery over a large chain simply because they like the friendly staff and cozy atmosphere, even though the chain offers lower prices. This decision is influenced by Liking Bias.
Social Norms: Influence of Norms on Customer Behavior
Think of a customer who chooses to buy a reusable water bottle because their peers are increasingly opting for sustainable products. This decision reflects the influence of Social Norms.
Weight Heuristic: Overemphasis on Weight of Information
Imagine a customer choosing a laptop solely based on its weight, preferring a lighter model despite the heavier one offering better performance, battery life, and durability. This choice demonstrates the Weight Heuristic.
Evaluative Simplification: Reducing Complexity of Evaluations
Imagine a customer deciding to buy a smartphone based solely on its camera quality, ignoring other features like battery life, processing speed, or durability. This decision is an example of Evaluative Simplification.
Commitment Bias: Staying Loyal to Initial Decisions
Think about a customer who signed up for a monthly subscription box service and continues to stay subscribed, even though they’re not fully satisfied with the products anymore. This customer doesn’t want to cancel because they’ve already invested time and money into the subscription. This is an example of Commitment Bias.
Anthropocentric Bias: Human-Centered Thinking in Evaluations
Imagine a customer who chooses a travel destination based on how human-friendly the amenities are, like comfortable hotels and easy access to dining options, rather than the natural environment or cultural experiences that are available. This scenario demonstrates Anthropocentric Bias.
Self-Categorization Theory: Group Identity Influencing Behavior
Think about a customer who chooses a particular brand of sneakers because they believe it aligns with the identity of their favorite sports team. This decision isn’t just about the quality or price of the sneakers; it’s about a sense of belonging to a group they admire. This scenario illustrates Self-Categorization Theory.
Generosity Heuristic Effect: Decisions Influenced by Generosity
Imagine you’re at a grocery store, and a friendly employee offers you a free sample of a new snack. Not only do you try it, but you also feel more inclined to buy it, even if it wasn't initially on your shopping list. This scenario illustrates the Generosity Heuristic Effect.
Conversion Bias: Influence of Repeated Exposure on Beliefs
Imagine you hear a catchy advertisement jingle several times over the radio. At first, you might not think much of it, but as you hear it repeatedly, you start to remember it, and soon enough, you find yourself humming along. This scenario demonstrates Conversion Bias.
Explanatory Coherence: Preference for Coherent Explanations
Consider a customer reading reviews for a new smartphone. They come across two reviews—one that provides a detailed, consistent explanation of the phone’s performance and another that gives a vague, contradictory account. The customer is more likely to trust the coherent explanation, a result of Explanatory Coherence.
Differential Emotions Theory: Specific Emotions with Distinct Physiological Responses
Picture a customer receiving a surprise discount at checkout. They feel joy and excitement, which leads them to continue shopping and add more items to their cart. This scenario demonstrates Differential Emotions Theory.
Empirical Turnover: Changing Beliefs Based on Evidence
Imagine a customer who has always believed that high-end skincare products are not worth the price. However, after seeing consistent positive results from friends and reading numerous scientific studies supporting the efficacy of certain premium ingredients, their belief begins to shift. This change of mind due to new evidence is an example of Empirical Turnover.
Judgment Heuristic: Simplifying Complex Judgments
Think of a customer choosing a vacation package. Instead of comparing all the intricate details, they simply pick the one with the most attractive price and a few good reviews. This shortcut in decision-making exemplifies the Judgment Heuristic.
Perceptual Bias Effect: Misinterpreting Sensory Information
Imagine a customer tasting a wine they believe is expensive. Even if it’s the same as a cheaper wine, they might rate it higher in quality because they perceive it through the lens of its price tag. This scenario is an example of the Perceptual Bias Effect.
Anchoring Heuristic: Reliance on Initial Information
Picture a customer shopping for a laptop. The first model they see costs $1,500, and they think it’s too expensive. However, after seeing a few models priced at $2,000, the initial price of $1,500 starts to look more reasonable, and they decide to purchase it. This scenario demonstrates the Anchoring Heuristic.
Reappraisal Bias: The Role of Reinterpreting Events in Customer Satisfaction
Imagine a customer who experiences a delay in their flight due to weather conditions. Initially frustrated, they decide to focus on the positive aspects, like the opportunity to explore the airport or relax with a book. By reinterpreting the situation, they turn a negative experience into a more neutral or even positive one, showcasing Reappraisal Bias.
Neglect of Probability: Ignoring Probabilities in Decision Making
Picture a customer considering buying a lottery ticket. They know the odds of winning are astronomically low, yet they focus on the dream of hitting the jackpot and decide to buy the ticket anyway. This decision demonstrates the Neglect of Probability.
Simulation Heuristic: Judging Likelihood Based on Ease of Imagining an Event
Imagine a customer choosing between two vacation destinations. One is a tropical beach resort, which they can easily picture in their mind with clear blue waters and relaxing palm trees. The other is a historical city they've never visited before, making it harder to imagine the experience. They end up choosing the beach resort because they can vividly picture it, demonstrating the Simulation Heuristic.
Biological Essentialism: Believing Traits are Innate
Imagine a customer who believes that their ability to learn new technology is limited because they were not "born with" a knack for tech. They might avoid buying new gadgets or software, thinking they will never understand them. This belief showcases Biological Essentialism.
Goal Gradient Effect: Motivation Increases as Customers Near Their Goals
Picture a customer working towards earning a free coffee through a loyalty program at their favorite café. As they get closer to achieving the reward, they start visiting the café more frequently, eager to earn the remaining points. This scenario demonstrates the Goal Gradient Effect.
Divergence Bias: Preference for Unique Options
Imagine walking into a store looking for a new pair of sneakers. You see a wall filled with the latest styles, most of them in black or white. Suddenly, a bright green pair catches your eye, and even though you hadn’t thought about buying green sneakers, you feel drawn to them because they stand out from the rest. This scenario illustrates Divergence Bias.
Intellectual Humility: Recognizing Limits of One’s Knowledge
Consider a customer who is researching a new type of financial investment but realizes they don’t fully understand all the risks involved. Instead of making a quick decision, they seek out more information, ask for expert opinions, and carefully weigh their options. This thoughtful approach reflects Intellectual Humility.
Mental Accounting: Separating Money into Different Accounts Based on Subjective Criteria
Think about a customer who receives a tax refund and decides to splurge on a luxury item, even though they have other bills to pay. They rationalize this decision by categorizing the refund as "extra" money, separate from their regular income. This behavior illustrates Mental Accounting.
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Expectations Influencing Outcomes
Imagine a customer who believes that a new software tool they are about to use will be difficult and cumbersome. They approach it with hesitation and low expectations, leading to a less enthusiastic effort in learning how to use it. As a result, they struggle with the tool, confirming their initial belief that it is indeed challenging to use. This scenario demonstrates a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.
Agency Bias: Overattributing Actions to Human Agency
Picture a customer who believes that every time they have a poor experience with a service, it's because the employees were unmotivated or careless. This perspective highlights Agency Bias.
Naïve Realism: Believing One’s Perception is Objective Reality
Imagine a customer who is convinced that their preference for a particular smartphone brand is based purely on objective factors like quality and performance. They dismiss others' choices as uninformed or biased. This mindset reflects Naïve Realism.
Decision Avoidance: Avoiding Decisions Due to Complexity or Stress
Imagine a customer who is overwhelmed by the multitude of credit card options available and decides not to choose any card at all. This hesitation reflects the Decision Avoidance bias.
Evaluative Bias: Preference for Positive Evaluations
Think of a situation where a customer prefers a product that has been reviewed positively, even though they haven't thoroughly assessed the product’s actual features themselves. This inclination showcases the Evaluative Bias.
Formality Bias: Preference for Formal Over Informal Information
Imagine a business professional who prefers reading official reports over casual blog posts, believing the formal documents to be more credible. This scenario illustrates Formality Bias.
Value Contrast Effect: Comparing Values in Decision Making
Picture a shopper choosing between two different clothing brands. The first brand is known for its premium quality but is quite expensive, while the second offers decent quality at a more affordable price. The shopper decides on the second brand, thinking they’re getting better value for their money. This decision reflects the Value Contrast Effect.
Influence of Mood: Decisions Altered by Mood States
Imagine a customer shopping for a new pair of shoes. On a particularly good day, they may be more inclined to splurge on a designer brand, while on a bad day, they might opt for a more practical and budget-friendly option. This scenario highlights the Influence of Mood on decision-making.
Ostrich Effect: Ignoring Negative Information in Customer Feedback
Picture a customer who receives several negative reviews about a product they're interested in but chooses to ignore them and focus only on the positive reviews instead. This selective attention illustrates the Ostrich Effect.
Absolute Threshold Bias: Sensory Perception Limits Influencing Decisions
Imagine a customer testing perfumes at a store. After smelling several scents, they find it difficult to differentiate between them because their sensory perception has reached its limit. This situation exemplifies the Absolute Threshold Bias.
Homogeneity Bias: Overestimating Similarity Within Groups
Imagine a customer who assumes that all luxury cars offer the same features and benefits just because they belong to the same high-end category. They make this assumption without considering the unique aspects of each brand or model. This scenario illustrates the Homogeneity Bias.
Recency Effect: Lasting Impact of Most Recent Customer Interactions
Imagine a customer who is deciding whether to continue their subscription with a streaming service. They recently had a negative experience with the customer service team, which heavily influences their decision, overshadowing the positive experiences they had in the past. This scenario illustrates the Recency Effect.
Normative Social Influence: Conforming to Social Norms in Customer Behavior
Imagine a customer at a restaurant who decides to order the same dish as their friends, even though they initially wanted something different. They conform to the group's choice due to Normative Social Influence.
False Fame Effect: Misattributing Familiarity to Fame
Picture a customer browsing through a list of product reviews. They come across a name that seems familiar and automatically assume that person must be an expert or someone of importance. This customer is experiencing the False Fame Effect.
Rationalization Bias: Justifying Actions and Beliefs
Think of a customer who buys an expensive watch. When asked why they made the purchase, they justify it by saying it's an "investment" that will hold its value, even though their decision was initially driven by impulse or status. This behavior illustrates Rationalization Bias.
Anchoring Heuristic: Initial Information Heavily Influencing Decisions
Imagine a customer shopping for a car. The first car they see is priced at $40,000. This price then becomes their reference point, or "anchor," and heavily influences their perception of all other cars' value and pricing, regardless of those cars' features or true value. This scenario illustrates the Anchoring Heuristic.
Overinterpretation: Overanalyzing Simple Data
Think of a customer who reads every online review for a product, analyzing each word for hidden meanings or insights. They might end up more confused and indecisive than when they started. This behavior is influenced by Overinterpretation.
Correlation Illusion: Perceiving Nonexistent Relationships in Data
Imagine a customer who believes that every time they wear a particular shirt, their favorite sports team wins. They may think there is a connection between the two, even though these events are unrelated. This belief is influenced by Correlation Illusion.
Heuristic Processing: Using Mental Shortcuts in Decision Making
Imagine a customer shopping for a new phone. Overwhelmed by the numerous options available, they decide to go with the brand they’ve always trusted, even though they haven’t thoroughly compared all the features. This decision is influenced by Heuristic Processing.
Benevolent Sexism: Favorable, but Patronizing, Attitudes Toward Women
Imagine a customer support scenario where a male customer is given straightforward, technical information about a product, while a female customer receives more simplified, softer explanations, assuming she may not understand the technical details. This approach, although seemingly considerate, is an example of Benevolent Sexism.
Contextual Dynamics: Dynamics of Context Over Time
Picture a customer shopping for winter clothes in a warm climate. They might struggle to appreciate the value of a heavy coat or woolen scarf because the current context—warm weather—affects their judgment. This is a result of Contextual Dynamics.
Comparative Optimism: Believing Personal Risks are Lower than Others
Imagine a group of people thinking about buying travel insurance. Many might feel they don’t need it, believing that accidents or mishaps are less likely to happen to them than to others. This belief is rooted in Comparative Optimism.
Temporal Projection: Projecting Current Time Perceptions into the Future
Think of a customer planning a vacation. If they feel stressed and overwhelmed today, they might imagine their future vacation will also be stressful and not enjoyable, even if they typically enjoy vacations. This is due to Temporal Projection.
Abnormality Bias: Preference for Normalcy Over Abnormal Events
Imagine a customer deciding whether to buy a product that claims to be unique and unconventional. While some customers might be intrigued, others may hesitate, preferring a more standard option. This hesitation stems from Abnormality Bias.
Misleading Vividness: Overemphasis on Vivid Information
Imagine a customer reading a product review that vividly describes a negative experience with a detailed and emotional narrative. Despite many positive reviews, this vivid account sticks in their mind, leading them to hesitate before making a purchase. This reaction is driven by Misleading Vividness.
Behavioral Projection: Projecting Current Behaviors into the Future
Imagine a customer who is trying out a new habit, like using a fitness app. They might feel confident about sticking to their workout routine and believe they’ll maintain this behavior long-term. This assumption is a result of Behavioral Projection.
Perception Bias: Misinterpretation of Sensory Information
Imagine two customers tasting the same dish at a restaurant. One finds it delicious, while the other thinks it’s bland. Their different interpretations aren’t just about taste—they’re influenced by Perception Bias.
Temporal Proximity Bias: Preference for Events Closer in Time
Imagine you're choosing between two rewards: one that you can have today and another that will be available in six months. Even if the latter is more valuable, the immediate reward often feels more enticing. This preference is driven by Temporal Proximity Bias.
Risk Perception: Customers’ Subjective Judgments of Risk
Picture a customer considering whether to invest in a new, innovative technology. One customer eagerly embraces the opportunity, focusing on potential rewards, while another hesitates, concerned about possible failures or losses. These differing decisions are influenced by Risk Perception.
Optimism-Pessimism Spectrum: Impact on Customer Satisfaction
Think of two customers looking at the same product: one sees all the possibilities it offers and is excited about the purchase, while the other worries about potential issues and is hesitant to buy. These different perspectives are rooted in the Optimism-Pessimism Spectrum.
Observation Bias: Influence of Being Observed on Behavior
Picture a customer in a store who becomes more conscious of their actions when they notice a security camera. They might adjust their behavior, perhaps by being more careful or polite, because they feel they are being watched. This is an example of Observation Bias.
Holistic Thinking Bias: Integrating Information for Global Perception
Imagine a customer evaluating a brand based on its overall reputation rather than individual products or services. They might overlook specific product details because they focus on the brand’s general image. This is an example of the Holistic Thinking Bias.
Neglect of Probability Effect: Ignoring Probabilities in Decision Making
Imagine a customer who purchases a lottery ticket, fully aware that the chances of winning are minuscule, yet they believe they might be the one to hit the jackpot. This behavior is a classic example of the Neglect of Probability Effect.
Anchoring Effect: Influence of Initial Information on Customer Perception
Imagine you walk into a store and see a product priced at $500, but then notice that it’s marked down to $300. Even if $300 is still more than you wanted to spend, the initial price of $500 makes the $300 price seem like a great deal. This shift in perception is driven by the Anchoring Effect.
Temporal Heuristic: Judging Based on Time Frames
Imagine a customer who decides to purchase a product simply because it is part of a limited-time offer, even though they may not need it immediately. This decision-making process is influenced by the Temporal Heuristic.
Cross-Modal Bias: Influence of One Sensory Modality on Another
Imagine walking into a restaurant where the dim lighting and soft music make the food taste richer and more luxurious. This perception shift is an example of Cross-Modal Bias.
Delayed Gratification: Preference for Later, Larger Rewards
Imagine a customer who decides to skip an impulsive purchase today, choosing instead to save for a more significant purchase in the future. This decision reflects the concept of Delayed Gratification.
Ownership Heuristic: Valuing Owned Items More Highly
Picture a customer who refuses to sell their old car, even though it’s worth much less than the market value they believe it should command. This overvaluation is a classic example of the Ownership Heuristic.
Testimonial Bias: Overvaluing Personal Testimonials
Imagine a scenario where a customer is considering buying a product and comes across a glowing review from another customer. Even though the customer knows little about the reviewer, the personal testimonial heavily influences their decision. This is an example of Testimonial Bias.
Renascence Podcasts
Experience Loom
Discover the latest insights from industry leaders in our management consulting and customer experience podcasts.
Aslan Patov x Gaia Living. Is Dubai's real estate market a bubble?
The guest of podcast is Atif, an investment consultant at Gaia Living. In this episode, we discussed whether Dubai's real estate market is a bubble, which areas in Dubai are best for investment, why the new palm is interesting for investment, and whether it is possible to buy real estate with cryptocurrency.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.